For agencies · Updated July 2026
A platform that writes drafts.
A team that ships the work.
Goodie AI is a serious AEO (answer-engine optimization) platform. It monitors how a brand appears in AI answers, prioritises fixes, produces long-form drafts with schema and citations through a built-in writer, and - most distinctively - pushes schema and feed changes into ecommerce storefronts. If your client's AI surface is a storefront, Goodie is genuinely the right call and we do not compete there. Found by AI is a different shape of thing: a white-label AI-search content programme you resell. The monitoring is not a dashboard - it is the brief. Detection is where other tools stop; the production is what we own.
Stop at the dashboard.
Show the gap. Don't address it with content production. A client looking at a monitoring dashboard with no content production is not a recurring conversation; it's a quarterly question.
Write briefs from keyword tools.
Briefs come from search-volume guesswork. They produce useful articles, but the priorities don't reflect what AI assistants are actually citing for the client's category.
Turn monitoring evidence into the next brief.
Last month's monitoring evidence - competitor appearances, citation gaps, missing facts, weak topics - becomes next month's content brief. Then the monthly proof report shows what changed.
The wedge is the loop, not any single layer of it.
A writer in the tool, or a team on the work
Goodie hands drafts to your team.
We do the content work for you.
Goodie AI is well built and unusually complete for a platform: monitoring, prioritised recommendations, a content writer that produces structured long-form drafts with schema and citations, and storefront-side integrations that push schema, feeds and product copy into ecommerce systems. That storefront work is a distinct capability and a genuine strength - if your client sells through a storefront and the problem is structured product data, Goodie does something we simply do not.
What a writer inside a platform still leaves you is a draft and a queue. Found by AI is the team rather than the tool. For the clients you sell us to, the monitoring is the brief, we write the articles against it, a named editor from your team or your client's reviews and signs them, we publish them to a blog on the client's subdomain or your white-label domain - one DNS record either way, and the monthly report documents what changed. Review before publish is the default and approval is role-gated; a draft left unreviewed for 7 days publishes with a notification - a default we disclose, changeable per client, the client's own writers can publish alongside the articles the programme produces, and the portal, report and emails carry your agency's brand. We never solicit your clients.
Where each one sits
Where Goodie AI sits
- A complete AEO platform: monitoring, prioritised recommendations and a built-in writer producing structured long-form drafts with schema and citations
- Storefront-side integrations - schema, feeds and product copy pushed into ecommerce systems. This is their standout capability and we have no equivalent
- A sensible buy for an agency with editorial capacity: the drafts land faster, and your team finishes and publishes them
Where Found by AI sits
- One programme, sold only through agency partners - you resell it, we run it, your brand is on it
- The monitoring is not a deliverable, it is the brief: the buying questions leading AI assistants answer without your client become the month's articles
- Written, reviewed and published for you - a named editor from your team or your client's on written-by and reviewed-by bylines, review before publish the default and automation opt-in per client
The operating difference
Detection is where most tools stop. The production is what we own.
Found by AI runs one loop for agency partners. Monitoring identifies the buying questions leading AI assistants answer without your client in them; those gaps become the month's brief; then we write, publish and measure the content that answers them. The monitoring is not a dashboard - it is the brief. All of it ships under your agency's brand.
| Generates content? | Publishes for you? | Publishing surface | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goodie AI | Yes - AI-written drafts inside the platform | Yes, including into ecommerce storefronts | Client's own site or storefront |
| Found by AI | Yes | Yes | Client's subdomain or your white-label domain - one DNS record either way, agency-branded |
Goodie AI
Found by AI
Articles carry named human editors from your team or your client's - a real person, their job title and a public professional profile, with written-by and reviewed-by bylines. Review before publish is the default and approval is role-gated; a draft left unreviewed for 7 days publishes with a notification - a default we disclose, changeable per client. Translated articles follow the same rule. The client's own writers can publish alongside the articles the programme produces. We never solicit a partner's clients.
Why this isn't 'AI in a coat'.
Every client asks their agency the same question: why can't we just do this with ChatGPT ourselves? The honest answer: you can write one good article that way.
We built the machinery for the fiftieth one - real research that reads the client's site and links deep into their product pages, layered quality gates, and rewrite passes that hunt down machine-sounding prose - then sign-off by a named editor from your team or your client's before anything goes out. It runs every month, on a schedule, under your agency's brand.
See how the programme works → Judge the output for yourself - we walk real articles, the editor bylines and the review flow end to end on a call.
Structural comparison
Deliberately no plan or price table. Their packaging changes, and a stale figure on our page would be worse for you than no figure at all - check anything commercial on Goodie AI's own site. What follows is the difference in shape, which doesn't go out of date.
| Found by AI | Goodie AI | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A delivered AI-search content programme, resold by agencies | An AI-visibility platform with a built-in AI writer and storefront integrations |
| What arrives each month | Published articles briefed from the monitoring, plus a report on what moved | Recommendations and AI-written drafts for your team to finish |
| Who writes the articles | We do - briefed from the monitoring, signed off by a named editor from your team or your client's | The platform drafts; your team edits and approves |
| Who publishes | We do - to a blog on the client's subdomain or your white-label domain - one DNS record either way | Your team, or their storefront integrations |
| Author accountability | A named reviewer from your team or your client's - real job title, public profile linked - with role-accurate written-by / reviewed-by credits and structured author data | Whatever byline your team applies |
| Review before publish | Configurable per client, with role-gated approval; the client's own writers can publish alongside the articles the programme produces | Your team's own editorial process |
| Whose brand the client sees | Yours - portal, monthly report and emails are white-labelled | Goodie's, inside the tool your team operates |
| Ecommerce and structured product data | None - we publish articles, not product feeds or storefront schema | Strong, and the right answer when the client is a storefront |
Key differences
Choose Goodie AI if…
- The client is an ecommerce storefront and the real problem is schema, feeds and product data. Goodie does that and we do not
- Your agency has editorial capacity and wants drafts to arrive faster rather than finished work to arrive on a schedule
- You would rather own the tool and the process internally than hand production to a partner
Choose Found by AI if…
- You run an agency without spare editorial capacity, and the gap between seeing the problem and shipping something about it is where client retainers stall
- You want a monthly artifact that makes the retainer defensible: what AI assistants said, what we published about it, what changed
- You want it under your own brand, sold on your paper, with no risk of us going around you to your client
Where Goodie is stronger we have said so plainly. The split is simple: if the constraint is speed of drafting, buy the platform; if the constraint is that nobody finishes and publishes, take the programme.
Frequently asked questions
Is Found by AI a replacement for Goodie AI?
Only partly. Goodie is a platform with a writer inside it and storefront integrations we have no equivalent for. We run one programme for agency partners: the monitoring becomes the month's brief, we write, publish and measure the content, and it all ships under your agency's brand. If the client is a storefront with a product-data problem, Goodie is the better buy and we will say so.
Goodie also generates content. What is different about yours?
Two things. First, who finishes it: their writer produces drafts for your team to edit and publish, whereas we deliver published articles. Second, accountability: ours carry a named editor from your team or your client's - a real person, their job title and a public professional profile - with written-by and reviewed-by bylines and structured author data, and a review step you configure per client with role-gated approval.
Where do the articles get published?
To a blog we host on the client's subdomain or your white-label domain - one DNS record either way, so the content sits on the client's property. CMS connectors are on our roadmap and we will not attach a date to them. If the client's requirement is publishing straight into an existing storefront or CMS today, that is a point in Goodie's favour, not ours.
Can an agency run both?
Yes. Use Goodie for storefront clients and for teams that want to draft faster in-house; resell our programme for the clients where nobody has the hours to finish and publish. One is software your team operates, the other is work delivered on your behalf.
Bottom line
Goodie AI is a strong platform and clearly the better answer for an ecommerce storefront or an agency that wants to draft faster in-house. Found by AI is for the other case: the constraint is not drafting, it is that nobody finishes and publishes. The monitoring becomes the brief, we write and publish the content, signed by a named editor from your team or your client's, and the monthly report documents what changed - under your agency's brand, with a standing promise that we never approach your clients. We promise the process, not an outcome.
More comparisons
See the loop on one of your clients
Found by AI is sold only through white-label agency partners. Bring one client and we'll walk the monitoring, the articles it produced, the review flow and a real monthly report end to end.
Or start smaller: the free scan puts a focused set of buying questions to leading AI assistants and shows which get answered without your client - and who is named instead. The report comes to you.
Founding Pilot seats for agencies onboarding in 2026: one retained client, three report cycles, no cohort fee - and you walk away with a full export if it ends there. Ask us.
Not an agency? Then we're not the right people to buy from - but your agency might be. Get in touch and we'll tell you plainly whether there's a partner in your market.