For agencies · Updated July 2026
Trakkr hands you drafts.
We hand you published articles.
Trakkr is one of the few products in this category that does both halves: it tracks how a brand appears in AI answers and bundles AI-drafted articles for your team to finish and publish on the client's own site. That is a sensible bundle when you have an editor who is faster starting from a draft than from a blank page. Found by AI answers a different question. The monitoring is not a dashboard - it is the brief. Detection is where other tools stop; the production is what we own.
Stop at the dashboard.
Show the gap. Don't address it with content production. A client looking at a monitoring dashboard with no content production is not a recurring conversation; it's a quarterly question.
Write briefs from keyword tools.
Briefs come from search-volume guesswork. They produce useful articles, but the priorities don't reflect what AI assistants are actually citing for the client's category.
Turn monitoring evidence into the next brief.
Last month's monitoring evidence - competitor appearances, citation gaps, missing facts, weak topics - becomes next month's content brief. Then the monthly proof report shows what changed.
The wedge is the loop, not any single layer of it.
What each one does
Trakkr gets you to a draft.
We get you to a published article.
Trakkr tracks a brand's presence in AI answers and generates long-form drafts against it, tuned to a brand voice and target queries. It's honest about where it stops: the editing, the schema markup, the CMS step and the publish decision stay with your team. If you have an editor with hours to spare, that's a genuine productivity win - a draft is a real head start, and Trakkr is efficient at producing them.
Found by AI is a white-label AI-search content programme sold through agencies. The loop is the product: monitoring identifies the buying questions leading AI assistants answer without your client in them, those gaps become the month's brief, and we write, publish and measure the content that answers them. Articles carry a named editor from your team or your client's - a real person, their job title and a public professional profile, with written-by and reviewed-by bylines and structured author data. Review before publish is the default and approval is role-gated; a draft left unreviewed for 7 days publishes with a notification - a default we disclose, changeable per client, and the client's own writers can publish alongside the articles the programme produces. We publish to a blog we host on the client's subdomain or your white-label domain - one DNS record either way. Portal, monthly report and emails carry your agency's brand, and we never solicit a partner's clients.
Where each one sits
Where Trakkr sits
- Tracking and drafting bundled in one tool - unusual in this category, where most products do one or the other
- Built for teams with an editor: the draft is the deliverable, and finishing it is where your team's judgement goes
- A tool you operate, at a self-service scale - no supplier relationship to manage
Where Found by AI sits
- One programme, sold only through white-label agency partners - you resell it, we run it, your brand is on every surface
- The loop is the product: monitoring becomes the brief, the brief becomes published articles, the report documents the change
- A named editor from your team or your client's on written-by and reviewed-by bylines, review before publish the default and automation opt-in per client, with role-gated approval
The operating difference
Detection is where most tools stop. The production is what we own.
Found by AI runs one loop for agency partners. Monitoring identifies the buying questions leading AI assistants answer without your client in them; those gaps become the month's brief; then we write, publish and measure the content that answers them. The monitoring is not a dashboard - it is the brief. All of it ships under your agency's brand.
| Generates content? | Publishes for you? | Publishing surface | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trakkr | Yes - AI drafts for your team to finish | — | Client's own site |
| Found by AI | Yes | Yes | Client's subdomain or your white-label domain - one DNS record either way, agency-branded |
Trakkr
Found by AI
Articles carry named human editors from your team or your client's - a real person, their job title and a public professional profile, with written-by and reviewed-by bylines. Review before publish is the default and approval is role-gated; a draft left unreviewed for 7 days publishes with a notification - a default we disclose, changeable per client. Translated articles follow the same rule. The client's own writers can publish alongside the articles the programme produces. We never solicit a partner's clients.
Why this isn't 'AI in a coat'.
Every client asks their agency the same question: why can't we just do this with ChatGPT ourselves? The honest answer: you can write one good article that way.
We built the machinery for the fiftieth one - real research that reads the client's site and links deep into their product pages, layered quality gates, and rewrite passes that hunt down machine-sounding prose - then sign-off by a named editor from your team or your client's before anything goes out. It runs every month, on a schedule, under your agency's brand.
See how the programme works → Judge the output for yourself - we walk real articles, the editor bylines and the review flow end to end on a call.
Structural comparison
Deliberately no plan or price table. Their packaging changes, and a stale figure on our page would be worse for you than no figure at all - check anything commercial on Trakkr's own site. What follows is the difference in shape, which doesn't go out of date.
| Found by AI | Trakkr | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A delivered AI-search content programme, resold by agencies | A tracker bundled with AI drafting, operated by you |
| What arrives each month | Published articles plus a report on what moved | Tracking data and drafts to finish |
| Who finishes the writing | We do | Your team |
| Who publishes | We do - client's subdomain or your white-label domain - one DNS record either way | Your team, in the client's CMS |
| Raw output volume | Fewer pieces - each one finished, reviewed and live | More drafts per month, if your team can absorb them |
| Author accountability | A named reviewer from your team or your client's - real job title, public profile linked - with role-accurate written-by / reviewed-by credits and structured author data | Whoever your team puts on the byline |
| Review before publish | Configurable per client, role-gated; the client's own writers can publish alongside the articles the programme produces | Your team's own editorial process |
| Whose brand the client sees | Yours - portal, monthly report and emails are white-labelled | Theirs |
Key differences
Choose Trakkr if…
- You have an editor with capacity. If someone on your team is faster from a draft than a blank page, Trakkr's bundle is efficient and ours would duplicate a person you already pay
- You want raw volume you can triage yourself, and you'd rather have more starting material than fewer finished pieces
- You want tracking and drafting in one self-service tool, with no supplier relationship to manage
Choose Found by AI if…
- You run an agency with no spare editorial capacity, and drafts that pile up unfinished are not progress
- You want a monthly artifact that defends the retainer: what the assistants said, what we published about it, what changed
- You want a named editor from your team or your client's accountable on the byline, and the whole thing under your brand, from a supplier who never approaches your clients
We would rather lose the deal than win it from an agency Trakkr fits better. Qualifying out is cheaper than a cancelled contract, for both of us.
Frequently asked questions
What does Trakkr actually do?
Trakkr tracks how a brand appears in AI-assistant answers and bundles AI-drafted long-form articles alongside the tracking, tuned to a brand voice and target queries. Your team edits, marks up and publishes them on the client's own site. For plans and coverage, read their own site - we deliberately don't restate competitor figures here, because ours would go stale and theirs are authoritative.
Does Trakkr publish content for you?
No - it generates. Each draft is real starting material, but the editing, the CMS step and the publish decision stay with your team, and Trakkr is upfront about that. With us, articles get written against the monitoring evidence, carry a named editor from your team or your client's with written-by and reviewed-by bylines, pass whatever review step you've configured for that client, and go live on a blog we host on the client's subdomain or your white-label domain - one DNS record either way.
Isn't more drafts better than fewer articles?
Only if someone finishes them. Volume isn't the variable - whether the work reaches an audience is. If you have an editor with hours, a bigger pile of drafts is a genuine advantage and Trakkr is the efficient way to get it. If drafts sit unfinished because nobody owns the last mile, fewer published pieces do more than more unpublished ones. That's a question about your team, not about either product.
Why does Trakkr appear on two of your comparison pages?
Because they do both halves - visibility tracking and content generation - which is rare. This page looks at them from the tracking side; the comparison at /compare/trakkr looks at them from the content side. Same competitor, two angles, same structural difference: they deliver drafts, we deliver published articles.
When is Trakkr the better buy?
When you have an editor. An agency with someone who will take a draft to publication quickly is squarely their buyer, and we'd tell you so on a call rather than after you'd signed with us. We're the better fit when the bottleneck is the last mile, not the first draft.
Bottom line
Trakkr is a well-built bundle and for an agency with an editor it is a genuinely good answer - a draft is a real head start and they produce them efficiently. Found by AI answers a different question: what happens when nobody has the hours to finish them. We take the monitoring as the brief, produce and publish the content with a named editor from your team or your client's behind it, and document the change each month - under your agency's brand, and we never approach your clients. We promise the process, not a position in anyone's answer.
More comparisons
See the loop on one of your clients
Found by AI is sold only through white-label agency partners. Bring one client and we'll walk the monitoring, the articles it produced, the review flow and a real monthly report end to end.
Or start smaller: the free scan puts a focused set of buying questions to leading AI assistants and shows which get answered without your client - and who is named instead. The report comes to you.
Founding Pilot seats for agencies onboarding in 2026: one retained client, three report cycles, no cohort fee - and you walk away with a full export if it ends there. Ask us.
Not an agency? Then we're not the right people to buy from - but your agency might be. Get in touch and we'll tell you plainly whether there's a partner in your market.